International Judicial Monitor
Published by the International Judicial Academy, Washington, D.C., with assistance from the
American Society of International Law

Summer 2015 Issue

EDITORIAL

 

The Role of Judges in a World Drifting Toward Chaos

Dr. James G. Apple

By: James G. Apple, Editor-in-Chief, International Judicial Monitor and President, International Judicial Academy

This Summer 2015 issue of the International Judicial Monitor is being published in October, 2015. Although it is a little late, since summer officially ended some weeks ago, the lateness does offer an opportunity to comment on a significant milestone in human history – the 70th anniversary of the creation of the United Nations.

The United Nations was founded in October, 1945, not long after the strife of the Second World War ended. One of the significant features of the UN Charter is its commitment to international law, as expressed very clearly and especially by the creation of the International Court of Justice (ICJ). That commitment to international law has waxed and waned over the 70 year UN history, but it is still recognized as an integral part of the UN structure, and demonstrated by the very large number of institutions, international laws, peacekeeping missions, cases before the World Court, and other actions and activities initiated since 1945. The large number of international institutions and bodies that help create and perpetuate international law, either by specific laws or declarations, or by actions that create international norms which grow into and form a good part of the fabric of international law, is demonstrated by a small booklet published by the American Society of International Law in 2004 in celebration of its 100th anniversary. The booklet is titled International Law: 100 Ways It Shapes Our Lives. The International Judicial Monitor has a regular column in every issue that explores one of the 100 ways in more depth than presented in the booklet. There is a 100 Ways article in this issue. Many of the 100 ways have behind them initiatives originating in the 70 year existence of the United Nations.

Likewise the work of the International Court of Justice has substantially increased over those 70 years, because the number of cases filed has enlarged substantially. There are currently 12 cases pending before the ICJ. From its establishment in1946 161 cases have been presented to the Court for resolution.

In addition a substantial number of new courts have been created, some by the United Nations. Others, such as the International Criminal Court, were established outside the UN.

International law has become a familiar phrase in the lexicon of governments and leaders of government in those 70 years. At the end of September of this year, President Obama delivered a speech to the UN General Assembly in recognition of 70th anniversary of the founding of the UN. What follows are excerpts from that speech relating to international law:

[T]he United States has worked with many nations in the is this Assembly…by building an international system that imposes a cost on those who choose conflict over cooperation, an order that recognizes the dignity and worth of all people.

[W]e have pressed forward slowly, steadily, to make a system of international rules and norms that are better and stronger and more consistent.

It is this international order that has underwritten unparalleled advances in human liberty and prosperity. It is this collective endeavor that has brought about diplomatic cooperation between the world’s major powers, and buttressed a global economy that has lifted more than a billion people from poverty. It is these international principles that helped constrain bigger countries from imposing their will on smaller ones, and advanced the emergence of democracy and development and individual liberty on every continent

[W]e see some major powers assert themselves in ways that contravene international law.

 

 

We live in an integrated world – one in which we all have a stake in each other’s successes.

[U]nless we work with other nations under the mantle of international norms and principles and laws that offer legitimacy to our efforts, we will not succeed.

This institution was founded because men and women who came before us had the foresight to know that our nations are more secure when we uphold basic laws and basic norms, and pursue a path of cooperation over conflict. And strong nations, above all, have a responsibility to uphold this international order.

[L]ike every nation gathered here, we have an interest in upholding the basic principles of freedom of navigation and the free flow of commerce, and in resolving disputes through international law, not the law of force.

[I]f it’s in the interest of major powers to uphold international standards, it is even more true for the rest of the community of nations.

President Obama’s speech is just one example of a world leader who makes reference to international law.

All of this leads to a topic worthy of exploration – the role of judges, not just judges serving on international tribunals, but judges in individual nations, in promoting international law to meet the demands and requirements that will take place in the world community in the next decades.

There are several ways in which judges can legitimately encourage the recognition and growth of international laws

  • Become acquainted with international law and its principles through self education, as well as by attendance at international law seminars and conferences.
  • Encourage organizations that deliver continuing education seminars and other programs that are attended by judges to include international law in the curriculum or agenda.
  • In the preparation of opinions search for applicable international norms, rules, and principles to support and apply or cite international law in those parts of an opinion where they would be appropriate. This is often possible because in every country and internationally, in particular cases and disputes there are always gaps in the “known”  applicable law. International law can be used to fill in the those gaps. Judges using or citing international law will encourage lawyers in future cases to look to and cite appropriate international law.
  • Attend lectures and presentations by those judges, lawyers and legal scholars well versed in international law about particular aspects or areas of international law useful in domestic litigation.
  • Encourage discussions about international law with colleagues on the same court or in the same community.
  • Take advantage of visiting foreign judges in a particular community by hosting them for visits to courthouses and providing social hospitality for them.

Judges need to take up the banner of international law and promote it, in order that international law can be useful and powerful in helping nations    and the world community in resolving disputes and avoiding war.

 

ASIl & International Judicial AcademyInternational Judicial Monitor
© 2015 – The International Judicial Academy
with assistance from the American Society of International Law.

Editor: James G. Apple.
IJM welcomes comments, suggestions, and submissions.
Please contact the IJM editor at ijaworld@verizon.net.