By: Iva Vukusic, International Judicial Monitor Correspondent in The Hague
One of the leading international law libraries
in the world, the Peace Palace Library in The Hague, recently presented a unique collection to its visitors and users. The material
collected by an Austrian journalist covering the Nuremberg proceedings was
bought at an auction some years ago and can now be studied in the reading room
of the famous library, located right next to the Palace housing, among others,
the International
Court of Justice.
Five
boxes of material with stickers containing the names of Nuremberg defendants
and others tried in subsequent proceedings are a pleasure to study for anyone
with a keen interest in law and history. Göring, von Papen, Lammers,
Frank, Keitel, Höss, Rosenberg, Eichmann are some of the individuals involved
in proceedings at Nuremberg that the Austrian journalist Peter Martin Bleibtreu
wrote about in the years following the Second World War. Folders contain mainly
material in German, but English-language items can be found among the trial
transcripts, witness statements, diplomatic cables, pictures and drawings from
the courtroom, correspondence with the family members of the accused, and
newspaper clippings. The cartoons from the courtroom are particularly
interesting, depicting the defendants and their facial expressions as they
heard evidence. The material has been provided for study as part of an effort
to mark the 70th anniversary, in 2015, of the Nuremberg proceedings. In November, the Library is planning to organize activities to revisit
this watershed moment in international law and policy.
The journalist who collected the material while
reporting for a Vienna-based newspaper, Peter Martin Bleibtreu, is somewhat of
a mysterious character and it seems not much is known about him to this day.
Even inquiries with the auction house that possessed the material yielded no
results, as they claimed to possess no detailed information. Apparently Bleibtreu claimed to have provided the cyanide capsule that Hermann Göring used to take his own life before he was to be executed, but this version of
events was never widely accepted. Much surrounding the death of the
high-ranking Nazi official remains unknown. This material, however, provides a
great insight into historical proceedings held almost 70 years ago. It provides
researchers with the opportunity to study the defendants and the type of
material that was used to prosecute them.
The
Charter of the International Military Tribunal provides details of mandate and
jurisdiction and outlines the three main crimes it would prosecute: crimes
against peace (which is essentially the crime of aggression today), war crimes, and crimes against
humanity. Genocide was still emerging as a concept, advanced by the efforts of
Raphael Lemkin, Polish lawyer of Jewish decent, and it was only defined in the Genocide Convention in 1948.
Since Nuremberg, both substantial and procedural
law developed and advanced incredibly in the courts, and the jurisprudence on
international criminal law is growing. The paradigm has changed and moved from
complete impunity towards accountability. There is no ongoing conflict today
with massive human rights violations which does not include some civil society
group, journalists or human rights activist calling for investigations and
prosecutions or, at least, an inquiry into the allegations. The project of
international justice is still imperfect and dependent on political support of
strong countries. This is made painfully obvious by the lack of response to the
continuous violations of international law committed in Syria. Many crimes
still don’t have their day in court. However, the project of international
justice is slowly progressing towards a system where laws are applied to
everyone equally. There are setbacks, naturally, but international justice is
here to stay. In the future, one might even hope for justice that provides some
redress to the victims.
The
accused in Nuremberg, where this modern effort of bringing perpetrators to
justice began, were high-ranking Nazi political and military officials. They
were brought before the court to face serious charges of, essentially, waging
aggressive war. Some of them were acquitted in proceedings that are often
hailed as being not only fair, but also efficient and short. The contemporary
war crimes trials are longer, especially in complex cases such as that of
Bosnian Serb commander Ratko Mladic or war-time political leader Radovan
Karadzic tried at the International Criminal Tribunal for the
former Yugoslavia.
Today’s proceedings depend on