By: Carolyn A. Dubay, Associate Editor, International
Judicial Monitof and
Assistant Professor, Charlotte Law School
In the famous United States Supreme
Court case Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963), Justice Hugo Black wrote
that “[t]he right of one charged with crime to counsel may not be deemed
fundamental and essential to fair trials in some countries, but it is in
ours.” Id. at 344. Fifty years later, times have changed. Countries
around the world commonly provide for such a right in their constitutions or
domestic law, and many others in the middle of constitutional reform are
addressing the urgent need for qualified counsel as rule of law and democracy
movements take hold.
The international legal community
has also long-recognized the role of counsel in securing human rights,
especially in the criminal context. The UN Basic Principles on the Role of
Lawyers (the “Basic Principles”) were adopted in 1990 at the Eighth United
Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders (now
known as the United Nations Congress on Crime Prevention and Criminal
Justice). They follow the Congress’s adoption of the UN Basic Principles on
the Independence of the Judiciary at the Seventh Congress in 1985. The Basic
Principles were not a new announcement about the importance of counsel, but
were designed to solidify the centrality of the legal profession in securing
the basic human rights delineated in the Charter of the United Nations, the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural
Rights, the Body of Principles for the Protection of All Persons under Any Form
of Detention or Imprisonment, the Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of
Prisoners, and the Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of
Crime and Abuse of Power. As the Basic Principles state
in their preamble:
. . . adequate protection of the human rights and
fundamental freedoms to which all persons are entitled, be they economic,
social and cultural, or civil and political, requires that all persons have
effective access to legal services provided by an independent legal profession
. . . .
Like judicial
independence, an independent legal profession depends on mechanisms to allow
access to justice, restraint of government actors in chilling the rights of
lawyers to form associations and express their opinions on important matters of
public concern, as well as the quality and ethics of the lawyers themselves
secured through adequate education and enforcement of ethical rules. The Basic
Principles address each of these elements through itemized commitments for
governments to undertake in the areas of (1) access to lawyers and legal
services; (2) special safeguards in criminal justice matters; (3)
qualifications and training of lawyers; (4) guarantees for the functioning of
lawyers; (5) freedom of expression and association for lawyers; (6) the role of
professional associations of lawyers; and (7) disciplinary proceedings for
lawyer misconduct.