International Judicial Monitor
Published by the International Judicial Academy, Washington, D.C., with assistance from the
American Society of International Law

Fall 2012 Issue
 

General Principles of International Law

 

Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW)

Carolyn A. Dubay

By: Carolyn A. Dubay, Associate Editor, International Judicial Monitor

There is no doubt that women play a central role in any society.  Even so, gender discrimination persists in many forms throughout the world today.  In developed and wealthy countries, discrimination may surface in the form of hard-to-discover pay differentials, as alleged in Lilly Ledbetter’s Equal Pay Act claim that made it all the way to the United States Supreme Court.  In oppressive societies, discrimination may take a violent turn, as in the case of Malala, the Pakistani girl shot by Taliban militants in response to the teenager’s advocacy for education for girls.

Regardless of the wealth, politics, or religion of any single nation, the United Nations has for decades been at the forefront of promoting women’s rights and equality.  Indeed, the Preamble to the Charter of the United Nations establishes as a preeminent goal “the equal rights of men and women." Other international agreements also stress the importance of women’s rights as human rights.  For example, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, all prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex in the rights and responsibilities they promote.

The process for drafting a comprehensive treaty specifically targeting women’s rights began in 1963, when the United Nations General Assembly invited the Commission on the Status of Women (CSW) to prepare draft international standards regarding gender equality.  The CSW was established in 1946 as a sub-commission of the U.N. Commission on Human Rights.  The early work of the CSW resulted in a number of important declarations and conventions that protect and promote women’s rights.  These conventions include the 1952 Convention on the Political Rights of Women, the 1957 Convention on the Nationality of Married Women, the 1962 Convention on Consent to Marriage, Minimum Age for Marriage and Registration of Marriages, and the 1965 Recommendation on Consent to Marriage, Minimum Age for Marriage and Registration of Marriages. 

In its first effort to produce a comprehensive international agreement on women’s rights, the CSW prepared the Declaration on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, which the United Nations General Assembly adopted in 1967.  Because the Declaration was only aspirational in nature, in 1972, the CSW sought support from the United Nations to draft a binding treaty to create affirmative obligations to end gender discrimination among signatory nations.  This support was immediately forthcoming, and the General Assembly went on to declare 1975 as International Women’s Year, organized the first World Conference on Women in 1975 in Mexico City, and further declared 1976 to 1985 to be the United Nations Decade for Women. 

The CSW’s work culminated in the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in 1979.   At the second World Conference on Women, held in 1980 in Copenhagen, 64 States signed the Convention, and on September 3, 1981, CEDAW entered into force.  To date, 187 out of 193 countries have ratified the treaty.  Only six countries have not yet ratified CEDAW - the United States, Iran, Sudan, Somalia, Palau and Tonga.  With respect to the United States, while President Jimmy Carter signed CEDAW, the Senate has never ratified it.  Despite efforts of subsequent presidents to re-initiate CEDAW ratification, future Senate action seems remote.  Opposition from conservative groups persists as they express concerns about the impact of CEDAW on states’ rights, the Convention’s reporting requirements, and the jurisdiction of the CEDAW Committee that oversees implementation of the Convention.

 

Unlike the aspirational nature of the initial Declaration, CEDAW imposes affirmative obligations on states parties to implement its provisions and to submit reports to the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women.  With respect to states parties to CEDAW’s Optional Protocol, the CEDAW Committee is also empowered to consider claims relating to potential violations of CEDAW and to initiate investigations in cases suggesting significant violations of women’s rights at the national level.  Moreover, the CEDAW Committee is empowered to make suggestions and general recommendations based on the reports of States’ parties.

CEDAW contains 30 articles that spell out in detail the obligations of states parties.  Importantly, the Convention requires states parties to “embody the principle of the equality of men and women in their national constitutions or other appropriate legislation if not yet incorporated therein . . . . “  Notably, states parties must also ensure gender equality through “competent national tribunals and other public institutions” and “to ensure that public authorities and institutions shall act in conformity” with the obligation to eliminate gender discrimination.   This holistic approach to gender rights thus contemplates not only the granting of rights to women, but credible opportunities to enforce them.

While CEDAW focuses broadly on legislative and other measures to prohibit gender discrimination generally, it also embodies rights and obligations in specific substantive areas where women’s rights have been undermined.  For example, states parties are to protect women’s political rights at the national and international level (such as the right to vote and participate in government, as well as the right to participate in domestic and international civil society organizations).  The Convention also directs states parties to take steps to eliminate human trafficking in women and to curtail prostitution.

At the national level, CEDAW has particularly significant provisions relating to the interface of women’s rights and customary laws and practices, which often can be the source of the most oppressive rules impacting women’s everyday lives.  States parties are to “take all appropriate measures, including legislation, to modify or abolish existing laws, regulations, customs and practices which constitute discrimination against women.”  This obligation coincides with CEDAW’s provisions relating to personal status laws that are often discriminatory towards women.  For example, “States Parties shall grant women equal rights with men to acquire, change or retain their nationality,” even in cases where a woman marries someone of another nationality.  Women are also guaranteed equal rights with men to determine the nationality of their children.   Similarly, women are to enjoy equal legal rights in other areas affecting legal capacity, such as the ability to contract, administer and own property, and choose a residence.  In the area of family rights, CEDAW also demands an end to discrimination in matters involving marriage, divorce, and raising children.  Other major areas of reform in CEDAW relate to discrimination in access to education, employment and healthcare. 

For more information on CEDAW, visit the website of the CEDAW Committee at
http://www.un.org/womenwatch/
daw/cedaw/committee.htm

ASIl & International Judicial AcademyInternational Judicial Monitor
© 2012 – The International Judicial Academy
with assistance from the American Society of International Law.

Editor: James G. Apple.
IJM welcomes comments, suggestions, and submissions.
Please contact the IJM editor at ijaworld@verizon.net.